Showing posts with label revising. Show all posts
Showing posts with label revising. Show all posts

Friday, November 30, 2012

Fortune Cookie Friday: Yoda on Revisions

 Fridays always feel like Chinese food sort of days, and what's takeout without a fortune cookie? Thus, Fridays will bring you tips, tricks, advice, and some riddles that might apply to everything but will turn a light bulb on in your head (or maybe I just like talking like Yoda).


On many long journeys have I gone. And waited, too, for others to return from journeys of their own. Some return; some are broken; some come back so different only their names remain.

Revisions anyone?

Happy writing! 

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

The Agent Answers: Rewrites

 You have questions? Do you constantly miss #askagent sessions on Twitter? Is it impossible, despite a hundred Google searches, to find an answer to your question? Then you've come to the right place. Ask a question either on any "Agent Answers" post or on Twitter, and I'll answer as many as I can. My answers will be subjective and should not be considered applicable to every agent (though I do like to assume my opinions are the majority).

Question: If we receive a "NO" and make a significant rewrite, is it worthwhile resubmitting?

Answer: That depends. If the agent rejected you based on the query, they're probably not interested in your concept. If you had 10 or so pages attached and you think your beginning is way better (and way different), you'll only be wasting thirty seconds of your time to send it and a few minutes of theirs (or their interns) to read it (two seconds to reject it). If the agent read a partial or full from you, it's probably really worth your time, at least, to try. I personally try to be very straightforward about requesting a revised ms. If I'm no longer interested in the concept, I'll just say no. If it still has promise, I'll go ahead and take a look.

All that said, I don't like to see five resubmissions for one project. Don't do that. One resubmission should be your max. I'd rather see you branch out and attempt new projects. I'm not saying "Give up, you suck!" I'm saying, "Know when your horse needs to take a break--he might not be dead, but he might be wheezing pretty heavily."

Happy revising!

Monday, January 10, 2011

Why your MS is getting Rejected

Why do agents request only a few pages to look at rather than the whole manuscript right off the bat if your query is amazing?  Because we can tell what your writing style is like within the first few pages.

What if you want us to look at pages further in the book because they are better and the first few pages aren't representative of your work?  Then revise your first section.

I've seen plenty of manuscripts that pick up after fifty pages, but that's fifty pages of work we have to put in (for free, and we have to weigh if the gamble is worth it).  There is plenty of advice out there on first sentences, first pages, and first chapters.  If you read my Wednesday Reads, you'll see how much weight I give to a first line--the ones I really love is when I don't want to stop at the first line, but give you several, or whole pages.

YA Highway recently did a blog post on the importance of using beta readers, which yes, I'll agree is very important.  But even if you have a professional copy editor edit your work line for line and every sentence is grammatically correct, it doesn't necessarily make for a book deal.  Ever read a textbook front to back without falling asleep?  Grammatically correct?  You bet.  Boring as heck?  You bet.  Why?  Story.  Plot.  Not delving into the anatomy of a whale for fifty pages... Am I talking about Moby Dick now too?  You bet.  Melville's sentences are grammatically correct as well, but I would never suggest a writer in today's market write a half page long sentence using fifteen semi colons (please don't).

For me, one of the quickest ways to test a writer's skills is to read a section with dialogue.  It needs to flow well, read like a real conversation, include enough description to lend action, have voice for each character, have it's own dialogue arch, emotion, and have a point.  You can't have a conversation for the sake of having a conversation. I also look to see where the first conversation comes in.  If it's ten pages in, I start to worry about back story dump.  Sometimes there will be long breaks without conversation in which the writer tries to move the story forward by summarizing--sometimes it works, and sometimes it doesn't.

So, your friends and computer spell check are probably great resources to go to for grammar and spelling, but beware of people saying "It's good."  Ask for constructive criticism.  Beg for it.  Even published books get scrutinized--or we wouldn't have book bloggers--and the reviews never stop at "it's good."  A good critique group is invaluable.  Having a professional look at it is even better (editors, work shops, industry friends), because they will tell you specifically what works and what doesn't and (hopefully) never leave off at "it's good."

Summing up, use your beta readers, but don't put all your stock in them.  Use critique groups, workshops, and professional editors (who don't stop at grammar but look at content and pacing).  If your ms is getting rejected after a few pages, you're sure your query is good (you'll know by how many agents request to see samples off your query), and your plot is unique, look at the writing.  It might not be up to par yet.  You might have errors in your ms that have nothing to do with grammar that still scream "Newbie! Newbie! Newbie!"

Happy revising!